Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1036820140190030285
Communication Sciences & Disorders
2014 Volume.19 No. 3 p.285 ~ p.293
Korean Late-Talkers¡¯ Use of the Mutual Exclusivity Assumption on First versus Second Label Learning
Choi Il-Ran

Hwang Min-A
Abstract
Objectives: In the present study, we investigated late-talkers¡¯ use of the mutual exclusivity assumption as they inferred the meaning of a novel-word in two different conditions: when a novel word could be the first label of a non-familiar object and when a novel word was the second label of a familiar object.

Methods: Fourteen Korean late-talkers age 24 to 35 months and fifteen typically developing peers participated in this study. In Experiment 1, the children were given photos of two objects, one familiar and the other non-familiar, and asked to choose the photo of a novel-word spoken by the examiner. In Experiment 2, the examiner showed the children a photo of a familiar object and used a novel-word (ex, pooty) as its label. Then, the children were shown a photo of that familiar object and a photo of a non-familiar object, and asked to choose which photo corresponded with the novel-word.

Results: In Experiment 1, both groups tended to choose non-familiar objects for the novel-words; there was no significant difference between the groups in the frequency of choosing non-familiar objects. In Experiment 2, while the typically developing children tended to map the novel words to the previously shown familiar objects (ignoring the mutual exclusivity assumption), the late-talkers tended to map the novel words to the non-familiar objects.

Conclusion: The bias toward mutual exclusivity shown in late-talkers may be useful in learning the first label of an object, but it can restrict acquisition of the various vocabulary related to that object.
KEYWORD
Late-talker, Mutual exclusivity assumption, Mapping of word meaning, Second label learning
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)